- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuWebinars
Leading Crypto Senator Sees End of Year as U.S. Legislation Target
Senator Cynthia Lummis said her realistic goal for the crypto bills is the close of 2025, despite President Donald Trump's wish to sign legislation in August.

What to know:
- Senator Cynthia Lummis predicted that the U.S. will produce long-awaited crypto legislation by the end of the year, though maybe not as soon as President Donald Trump called for.
- Lummis shared that timeline view on completing both market structure and stablecoin bills at a Bitcoin Policy Institute summit in Washington, which opened the day after she ran a Senate hearing in which she'd expressed some misgivings about partisanship looming over the crypto market structure debate.
- At the Tuesday hearing, the Wyoming Republican had acknowledged the Democrats' criticism of Trump ties to the industry.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In the wake of the U.S. Senate passing its first major crypto bill, one of the industry chief proponents there, Senator Cynthia Lummis, said the final step toward U.S. regulations for the crypto sector may take several more months to complete, potentially skipping past the August deadline set by President Donald Trump.
The Senate's recent approval of stablecoin legislation is just one of many steps that potentially remain in turning two related efforts — also including the push toward new rules to govern U.S. digital asset markets — into U.S. law.
When asked for a realistic timeline on this year's crypto efforts, Lummis told a Bitcoin Policy Institute audience in Washington, "I think before the end of this calendar year" for finishing all of the related legislation. The Wyoming Republican said she'd be "extremely disappointed" if that wasn't the case.
"We're in a good place," she said at the Wednesday event. But the chairwoman of the Senate Banking Committee's digital assets subcommittee also led a hearing on Tuesday to make a first foray into discussion of market structure legislation in that chamber, acknowledging it won't be easy. She hinted at the delicacy of the bipartisan wave that helped drive 18 Democratic votes (for 68 total) on the stablecoin bill last week, which she equated to "a tooth-pulling exercise."
At her Tuesday hearing, a shortage of Democrats showed up to question witnesses, and she made some remarks at the end revealing her awareness the parties are approaching the effort differently.
"I don't want to come up with a piece of legislation that the other side of the aisle feels they haven't had adequate input in, and so that is going to require maybe me to go out of my way to pursue additional discussions directly with the other side of the aisle," she said, questioning how the pursuit of crypto legislation became divisive. "It was very bipartisan then and now it seems not to be, and I don't understand what's changed, at least with regard to this topic."
Some Democratic lawmakers have demanded that Congress needs to insist in these bills that senior government officials, including the president, not be allowed to directly engage in crypto businesses. While Republican lawmakers have generally shied away from openly discussing the criticism that Trump's involvement amounts to federal government corruption, Lummis nodded toward that view on Tuesday.
"Maybe this is about concern that certain people that have family members in the administration are going to be advantaged in some way by what we're doing," she said. "I don't want that to be the case. I want everybody to be advantaged."
She noted at the Wednesday event that there was — at one point of the stablecoin debate in the Senate — a setback with the Democratic supporters, who hit the brakes to criticize some of the bill's security provisions and also the potential conflicts of Trump's personal crypto interests.
Those Democrats, including Senator Ruben Gallego, did come around later. But it's so far unclear how much those lawmakers will press for the market structure effort to ban government officials from crypto and whether that would be a deal breaker for Republicans.
At this point, the U.S. House of Representatives has been in the lead on crypto market structure, having passed its Digital Asset Market Clarity Act from two committees on its way toward the House floor. But it now has to fix on a strategy for how it may or may not fold the stablecoin effort into that bill or pursue it separately. One option is to simply sign off on the Senate's Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, which would send that piece to Trump more immediately, as he requested in a recent social-media post.
The Senate remains the highest hurdle for U.S. legislation, so any House successes will run into the need to win wide Democratic support in the Senate.
Read More: U.S. Senators Pitch New Crypto Market Structure Framework as Hearing Approaches
Jesse Hamilton
Jesse Hamilton is CoinDesk's deputy managing editor on the Global Policy and Regulation team, based in Washington, D.C. Before joining CoinDesk in 2022, he worked for more than a decade covering Wall Street regulation at Bloomberg News and Businessweek, writing about the early whisperings among federal agencies trying to decide what to do about crypto. He’s won several national honors in his reporting career, including from his time as a war correspondent in Iraq and as a police reporter for newspapers. Jesse is a graduate of Western Washington University, where he studied journalism and history. He has no crypto holdings.
